Problem with Evil Existence of God

Today the news is filled with coverage on various intrinsic catastrophes and other related causalities that the great unwashed face daily. Anyone stomach look into their lives or tear down their neighbors and see the presence of misfortune that surrounds our institution. This puzzle has brought up the issue of deitys reality in spectral philosophical discussions. For centuries, many recurrence over tried to dismiss the human race of idol on the basis of the existence of mephistophelian. Lets consider where graven image has been localised in peoples lives through erupt our history.For the Grecians and Romans graven images were thought to exist wisdom, war, and other actions that homo beings took (Spitzer 5). As knowledge continued to progress beau ideal was thought to live in heaven, beyond the realm of the planets. He was believed to deplete created life thousands of years ago. Soon as human knowledge progressed even further weve diddleed about the Big Bang, DNA , and evolution (Spitzer 14). It seems that the to a greater extent(prenominal) creation know, the further back divinity fudge gets pushed. Often, it appears as if humans use perfection as a placeholder for the unknown, entirely as we attend more, he gets redefined.Philosophers caput whether or not on that point ass be a wholly peachy immortal that would create such(prenominal)(prenominal) a foundation where flagitious exists. This pursuit is known as the task of devilish. According to the fuss of evil, the extent of evils in the world seems to conflict with the existence of an omniscient, omnibenevolent, and powerful divinity fudge. Theodicy is a study where theists are able to get together and take a crap their public debates disclosing in moldation on the compatibility among immortal and evil. This seems to be one of the close to perplexing problems theists put on to face.In todays world, on that point are many differing opinions as to whether a divinit y fudge exists or not. This obviously has been an issue of great dispute because many people worship different gods or no god at alone. I provide define theodicy discuss the conflict between an omniscient immortal and the existence of evil, and touch on free will and how it plays into natural and incorrupt evil. Theodicy is the branch of theology that defends divinitys superbness and justice in the face of the existence of evil (dictionary. com). Theodicy is a term hat come ons from the Greek words theos meaning god and dike meaning righteous. The staple fiber form of theodicy involves these hypothesiss that God is e really(prenominal) untroubled and powerful therefore he is in each(prenominal) in each(prenominal) knowing and that the universe was made by God and does it exist in a contingent relativeship to God. Also the assumption of the existence of evil and wherefore. (Mackie 150) This suggests that if God is all undecomposed and powerful he would choose to w ithdraw such evils. In the case of God being all right-hand(a) but not all powerful he whitethorn be unable(p) to intervene in the evils of this world.Or if God was just all powerful and not all good one must fall upon he has a malicious side to him to allow all this evil. assumptive that God is all these things both powerful and good if the universe doesnt exist in a contingent relationship to God thus he has little to do with the evil. With this being state still leaves the question why does evil exist? The basic comees to theodicy peck be said to take three forms logical/deductive, important/inductive, and existential. The logical problem of evil is a deductive one.If God is said to be all good, all powerful, and all knowing why should evil exist. Is it rational to believe in the existence of God? This is Mackies formulation of the problem God exists, is all good, all knowing, and all powerful. Such a being has no limits to its world power. A good being will al focal poi nts eliminate all the evil that it can. Evil exists, so God must not (Theodicy Overview). You can oblige with the first two statements, but one might argue the tercet statement by making the point that a good being will always eliminate all the evil that it can unless it has good causation to allow that evil.Therefore, a modified version of Mackies argument looks like this If God exists, then there is no evil, unless there is a reason that would justify Him in permitting it. Evil exists. There is no reason that would justify God to permit evil. So, God does not exist (Theodicy Overview). The determination behind this argument is to suggest that God is justified in permitting evil. The evidential problem of evil admits that God and the existence of evil are logically compatible, the concept of good and bad are known to go together. Considering the substance or various kinds of evil in the world conclude as vidence against the existence of God. This get argues that because of the large amounts of evil in the world and the existence of unjustified evil the belief in God is not pat.We ingest that God would refuse to allow such evils to exist that fail in appearance to obligate any good mathematical function. Here are examples of these objections. It seems that God could have eliminated more evil in the world and still completed the inspired purposes (Matson 145). Is such a God who does things this way worthy of worship, and therefore, plausible (Matson 145)? With little evidence its hard to prove or disprove if something exists. Dealing with a being such as God we may not always be able to understand his reasoning for allowing such evils and will not always see his greater purpose for his divine virtuous trainings. The existential approach often referred to as the religious approach to the problem of evil is the concept of why the low is happening to a certain individual and why at this time or place in this individuals life. Theodicy is now seen as practical more concerned with providing answers for those who suffer in specific circumstances.It is often that the existential approach turns from asking why God would allow such evils to happen to quite how one can go to God in search for him to jockstrap relieve them of their problems and find ways to make suffering and evil more tolerable. The focus is on how beli incessantlys should respond to God during their tribulations for example turning to faith, testimony, and worship. This is an overview on theodicy and introduces some of the main concepts that sets its foundation. Now the conflict between an omniscient God and the existence of evil seems to get very complicated.God is referred to be omnipotent, omniscient, and omnibenevolent simultaneously. If God is omnipotent this government agency he has power over anything and everything. If God is omniscient this means he is aware of all things that occur and if he is omnibenevolent this means he is wholly good. It would se em rational to believe that an omnibenevolent God would be of nature to relieve suffering wherever it is happening (Swinburne 67). An omniscient God would know when people are suffering, how they are suffering, and how that suffering may be relieved. An omnipotent God has the power to alleviate those who are suffering from their sufferings.So why does God allow evil to exist? Maybe God allows evil to exist because it is necessary for some greater good. For example, when a cite gives a kidskin bad tasting medicine or has the electric shaver undergo painful surgery. From the childs perspective they would feel as if they were being punished for something or enduring a form of evil. When this isnt the case at all the leaven is still looking out for the childs best interest (Swinburne 100). The child shows ignorance of the parents reasoning for forcing him/her to undergo the temporary pain and so the child finds this sermon unjust when in actuality it isnt.Perhaps we can use the me taphor of the childs cognition of his parents action to God and our perception of his creation of evil. For we cannot deny that some good the childs headland cannot even conceive may justify the parents in permitting the child to suffer. And by analogy, wont the same be true of God in relation to us as his children (Theodicy Overview)? This can conclude that we are some measure unable to see the bigger picture of Gods purpose when it comes to human suffering. God may be teaching us the secrets behind the clean-living enrol. Like what is just and in just.We are being taught moral responsibilities and moral traits to help us reach a greater good that God possibly has in store for our lives. Some still argue that this isnt the case at all. There are still many evils that put one acrosst necessarily seem to produce any good or help in the counter-balance between good and evil. One incident that comes to mind is the Holocaust. It was a horrific period of time in our history where genocide occurred. It is hard to believe that an all-powerful and all-knowing God would commence weak in preventing the nightmare in Auschwitz.Also if God is omnibenevolent we would ponder on the question how can he let something so malice take place on innocent lives? Is it reasonable to believe that all evils can be explained to where they occur to result in a greater good and that we are somehow unable to always make sense of why such and such thing are happening? It is possible that a massacre shooting at a school resulting in the remnant of many young lives may serve to promote a greater good, but it doesnt seem likely. Now there is a trace between the good parent and the good God.In such cases where a child is undergoing pain which they are incapable of understanding the parent is there to reassure them of their love and give them useful insight on burst understanding their situation and what it is their going through. There are numerous people who go through prolonged su ffering who are consciously unsuspecting of Gods presence. Going back to the incidents that occurred in Auschwitz it is unlikely that the bulk of prisoners matt-up Gods love and reassurance. They most likely felt abandoned and un-loved.Many would have to question where was God during this time and what pillowcase of parent does this make him. It appears that God acted like a negligent parent with a cold heart. With that being said we can make the assumption that God doesnt exist or the good-parent analogy fails. This argument that God allows evil to exist to show us the greater good seems to be implausible due to the event that such horrendous evils fail to show the greater good they are meant to produce. There are two basic forms of evil which are natural and moral.Natural evil is when the world experiences suffering caused by disease, earthquakes, floods, crashes, and so on. Moral evil is when someone chooses to act ill-bred establish on human will. Now natural evil cant be pr evented and is easily misunderstood to why God allows such natural disasters to occur. Where moral evil is based upon each individual and their code of ethics, how they differentiate right from awry(p). Some argue that God punishes people based on their actions because we have the ability to choose whats good and whats bad.This is where the free-will defense can cover moral evil, but it fails to cover natural evil. It is believed that God created man to possess free-will allowing him the freedom of choice. With the freedom of choice there becomes conflict when you have to make the decision between right and wrong. The detail that we have been taught to know what is right should benefit us when it comes to making the pause decision, but that isnt always the case. Due to the various temptations we have in our society many of us continue to fall short of the moral code. If God has made men such that in their free choices they sometimes prefer what is good and sometimes what is evil, why could he not have made men such that they always freely choose the good (Mackie 164)? It is easy to assume that such a being as God would want his creation to be wholly good like him, but this isnt the case at all. Some argue that if God was to have created us to always freely choose good we wouldnt be entirely entitled to freedom. If we were being forced to choose one way or the other we wouldnt be choosing freely.Without the ability to choose what is wrong we would no longer have to worry about greed, lust, violence, and other evils because they would no longer be a choice of ours. We would be free from temptations and only have innocent inclinations, and so could not exemplify the moral cheer of resisting and overcoming temptations to do wrong (Mackie 165). In conclusion, I do believe in the rationality behind the existence of God. Just because there is a problem with evil and a disagreement to why God would allow such evils to exist I feel there is a greater purpose behi nd Gods plan.The evils that are apparent in our society today teaches us the value of morals and the importance in having them. We are able to measure outside ourselves and our heart goes out to those we see suffering from deprivation all around the world. The idea of God being omniscient, omnipotent, omnibenevolent while there is an existence of evil seems to be problematic unless you can believe in the fact that it is possible we are incapable of comprehending all it is God is trying to teach us. For God to be unwilling to remove the devastation in this world there would have to be good reasoning behind all of this.To believe in God you are exercising your ability to have faith in a higher power. You are choosing to believe in something that has yet to be proven into existence. Faith is known to be very important to God and it is through the trials and tribulations you turn your faith towards God in search of comfort and understanding. I do believe that during the hard times God w aits for us to turn to him and trust in him that he has the ability to mitigate all our problems. It is necessary to experience or witness evils in the world because it is a way for us to build our faith and come into a closer connection with God.By God creating us having free-will this allows us to choose from what is good and what is evil. We are able to establish morals and learn the virtues of life. The great thing about this is that these lessons only come if we choose to learn them. It is our choice what we allow to dictate our lives. I believe if we are ever going to be able to see or comprehend what Gods divine purpose is for allowing such evils to exist we need to become more like him. Abiding by the laws of God is an option , a choice that he has left up to us.